patch-2.4.19 linux-2.4.19/arch/mips/ddb5476/int-handler.S

Next file: linux-2.4.19/arch/mips/ddb5476/irq.c
Previous file: linux-2.4.19/arch/mips/ddb5476/dbg_io.c
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index

diff -urN linux-2.4.18/arch/mips/ddb5476/int-handler.S linux-2.4.19/arch/mips/ddb5476/int-handler.S
@@ -1,136 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  arch/mips/ddb5074/int-handler.S -- NEC DDB Vrc-5074 interrupt handler
- *
- *  Based on arch/mips/sgi/kernel/indyIRQ.S
- *
- *  Copyright (C) 1996 David S. Miller (dm@engr.sgi.com)
- *
- *  Copyright (C) 2000 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@sonycom.com>
- *                     Sony Software Development Center Europe (SDCE), Brussels
- */
-#include <asm/asm.h>
-#include <asm/mipsregs.h>
-#include <asm/regdef.h>
-#include <asm/stackframe.h>
-
-/*
- * A lot of complication here is taken away because:
- *
- * 1) We handle one interrupt and return, sitting in a loop and moving across
- *    all the pending IRQ bits in the cause register is _NOT_ the answer, the
- *    common case is one pending IRQ so optimize in that direction.
- *
- * 2) We need not check against bits in the status register IRQ mask, that
- *    would make this routine slow as hell.
- *
- * 3) Linux only thinks in terms of all IRQs on or all IRQs off, nothing in
- *    between like BSD spl() brain-damage.
- *
- * Furthermore, the IRQs on the INDY look basically (barring software IRQs
- * which we don't use at all) like:
- *
- *	MIPS IRQ	Source
- *      --------        ------
- *             0	Software (ignored)
- *             1        Software (ignored)
- *             2        Local IRQ level zero
- *             3        Local IRQ level one
- *             4        8254 Timer zero
- *             5        8254 Timer one
- *             6        Bus Error
- *             7        R4k timer (what we use)
- *
- * We handle the IRQ according to _our_ priority which is:
- *
- * Highest ----     R4k Timer
- *                  Local IRQ zero
- *                  Local IRQ one
- *                  Bus Error
- *                  8254 Timer zero
- * Lowest  ----     8254 Timer one
- *
- * then we just return, if multiple IRQs are pending then we will just take
- * another exception, big deal.
- */
-
-	.text
-	.set	noreorder
-	.set	noat
-	.align	5
-	NESTED(ddbIRQ, PT_SIZE, sp)
-	SAVE_ALL
-	CLI
-	.set	at
-	mfc0	s1, CP0_CAUSE		# get irq mask
-
-#if 1
-	mfc0	t2,CP0_STATUS		# get enabled interrupts
-	and	s0, s1, t2		# isolate allowed ones
-#endif
-	/* First we check for r4k counter/timer IRQ. */
-	andi	a0, s0, CAUSEF_IP7	# cpu timer */
-	bnez	a0, cpu_timer_irq
-	andi	a0, s0, CAUSEF_IP2	# delay slot, check local level zero
-	beq	a0, zero, 1f
-	 andi	a0, s0, CAUSEF_IP3	# delay slot, check local level one
-
-	/* Wheee, local level zero interrupt. */
-	jal	ddb_local0_irqdispatch
-	 move	a0, sp			# delay slot
-
-	j	ret_from_irq
-	 nop				# delay slot
-
-1:
-	beq	a0, zero, 1f
-	 andi	a0, s0, CAUSEF_IP6	# delay slot, check bus error
-
-	/* Wheee, local level one interrupt. */
-	move	a0, sp
-	jal	ddb_local1_irqdispatch
-	 nop
-
-	j	ret_from_irq
-	 nop
-
-1:
-	beq	a0, zero, 1f
-	 nop
-
-	/* Wheee, an asynchronous bus error... */
-	move	a0, sp
-	jal	ddb_buserror_irq
-	 nop
-
-	j	ret_from_irq
-	 nop
-
-1:
-	/* Here by mistake?  This is possible, what can happen
-	 * is that by the time we take the exception the IRQ
-	 * pin goes low, so just leave if this is the case.
-	 */
-	andi	a0, s0, (CAUSEF_IP4 | CAUSEF_IP5)
-	beq	a0, zero, 1f
-
-	/* Must be one of the 8254 timers... */
-	move	a0, sp
-	jal	ddb_8254timer_irq
-	 nop
-1:
-	/* phamtom interrupt */
-	move 	a0, s1
-	jal	ddb_phantom_irq
-	nop
-	j	ret_from_irq
-	nop
-
-cpu_timer_irq:
-	li	a0, 0
-	move	a1, sp
-	jal	do_IRQ 
-	/* jal	ll_timer_interrupt */
-	nop
-	j	ret_from_irq
-	nop
-	END(ddbIRQ)

FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, linux-adm@nic.funet.fi
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen (who was at: slshen@lbl.gov)