From: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>
Ah yes, the comment needs updating to the fact that the code has changed.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---
25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/process.c | 4 +---
25-akpm/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c | 4 +---
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/process.c~fix-i386-x86_64-idle-routine-selection-comment-updates arch/i386/kernel/process.c
--- 25/arch/i386/kernel/process.c~fix-i386-x86_64-idle-routine-selection-comment-updates 2004-08-15 14:29:57.161606352 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/process.c 2004-08-15 14:29:57.167605440 -0700
@@ -218,9 +218,7 @@ void __init select_idle_routine(const st
printk("monitor/mwait feature present.\n");
/*
* Skip, if setup has overridden idle.
- * Also, take care of system with asymmetric CPUs.
- * Use, mwait_idle only if all cpus support it.
- * If not, we fallback to default_idle()
+ * One CPU supports mwait => All CPUs supports mwait
*/
if (!pm_idle) {
printk("using mwait in idle threads.\n");
diff -puN arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c~fix-i386-x86_64-idle-routine-selection-comment-updates arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
--- 25/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c~fix-i386-x86_64-idle-routine-selection-comment-updates 2004-08-15 14:29:57.162606200 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c 2004-08-15 14:29:57.168605288 -0700
@@ -169,9 +169,7 @@ void __init select_idle_routine(const st
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
/*
* Skip, if setup has overridden idle.
- * Also, take care of system with asymmetric CPUs.
- * Use, mwait_idle only if all cpus support it.
- * If not, we fallback to default_idle()
+ * One CPU supports mwait => All CPUs supports mwait
*/
if (!pm_idle) {
if (!printed) {
_