From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@austin.ibm.com>
The hotcpu_notifier macro does not properly record the given priority in
the notifier block. This causes trouble only for callers which specify a
non-zero priority, of which there are none (yet).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---
25-akpm/include/linux/cpu.h | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN include/linux/cpu.h~use-c99-struct-initializer-in-hotcpu_notifier include/linux/cpu.h
--- 25/include/linux/cpu.h~use-c99-struct-initializer-in-hotcpu_notifier Wed Jun 2 15:14:26 2004
+++ 25-akpm/include/linux/cpu.h Wed Jun 2 15:14:26 2004
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ extern struct semaphore cpucontrol;
#define unlock_cpu_hotplug() up(&cpucontrol)
#define lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible() down_interruptible(&cpucontrol)
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) { \
- static struct notifier_block fn##_nb = { fn, pri }; \
+ static struct notifier_block fn##_nb = \
+ { .notifier_call = fn, .priority = pri }; \
register_cpu_notifier(&fn##_nb); \
}
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu);
_