From: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@fsmlabs.com>
William spotted this stray bit, LOCK_SECTION isn't used anymore on x86_64.
Andrew i've diffed against -mm because i'd like for the irq enable on
contention patch to be merged, i believe making spinlock functions out of
line was a prerequisite Andi wanted before agreeing to the irq enable code.
Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@fsmlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---
include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h~remove-lock_section-from-x86_64-spin_lock-asm include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h
--- devel/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h~remove-lock_section-from-x86_64-spin_lock-asm 2005-09-03 16:20:08.000000000 -0700
+++ devel-akpm/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2005-09-03 16:20:08.000000000 -0700
@@ -23,14 +23,13 @@
#define __raw_spin_lock_string \
"\n1:\t" \
"lock ; decb %0\n\t" \
- "js 2f\n" \
- LOCK_SECTION_START("") \
+ "jns 3f\n" \
"2:\t" \
"rep;nop\n\t" \
"cmpb $0,%0\n\t" \
"jle 2b\n\t" \
"jmp 1b\n" \
- LOCK_SECTION_END
+ "3:\n\t"
#define __raw_spin_unlock_string \
"movb $1,%0" \
_