From: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
no need to call task_rq in setscheduler; just use rq
Signed-Off-By: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---
25-akpm/kernel/sched.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/sched.c~sched-no-need-to-recalculate-rq kernel/sched.c
--- 25/kernel/sched.c~sched-no-need-to-recalculate-rq 2004-12-03 20:56:32.880761552 -0800
+++ 25-akpm/kernel/sched.c 2004-12-03 20:56:32.887760488 -0800
@@ -3154,12 +3154,12 @@ recheck:
}
array = p->array;
if (array)
- deactivate_task(p, task_rq(p));
+ deactivate_task(p, rq);
retval = 0;
oldprio = p->prio;
__setscheduler(p, policy, lp.sched_priority);
if (array) {
- __activate_task(p, task_rq(p));
+ __activate_task(p, rq);
/*
* Reschedule if we are currently running on this runqueue and
* our priority decreased, or if we are not currently running on
_